Alliance Rupture Repair in Psychotherapy

By Elisabet Rosén

Life is full of ruptures. Misunderstandings, mis-attunements, break-ups and other interpersonal conflicts. It can feel scary to face these, especially in important relationships. At the same time, ruptures could be great opportunities to initiate change. When we manage to detect and manage ruptures in therapy, we help our clients onto the royal road to a new way of handling relationships.

 

Repairing ruptures in the therapeutic alliance takes gratitude, interest, care, responsibility and seeing things in light of patients´ relational history (Eubanks, Muran & Safran, 2018). Research tells us that when therapists repair even the smallest ruptures, results are better than rupture-free therapy, and definitely more successful than therapies where ruptures go unnoticed (Holmqvist, 2009). In this skill post, we will briefly discuss rupture repairs and dive into practice.

Ruptures are commonly divided into two types: Confrontation Alliance Ruptures and Withdrawal Alliance Ruptures. We think of confrontation ruptures in therapy as moments where clients express their critique towards the therapist or therapy. Repairing these Confrontation Alliance Ruptures is a work towards increased trust and closeness in relationships (Safran & Muran, 2000). Confrontation ruptures will be addressed in a future blog post.

Withdrawal Alliance Ruptures are a “sneakier” variant of ruptures, and can therefore be harder to detect. They often come in many vague variations. For example:

• Denial

• Giving minimal response

• Changing subject

• Intellectualizing

• Telling stories

• Talking about others´ reactions

• Being over considerate and compliant

• Splitting affect and content of story (telling a sad story with a giggle)

• Self-punishing and hopelessness

• No-shows, cancellations, not paying

• Misunderstandings

• Unintentional ironies or sarcasm

• Irritation, that is not acknowledged by the client or the therapist

 

The aim of repairing a Withdrawal Rupture is to help the client approach the experience of a rupture, rather than avoiding it. This helps the client move towards increased independence and assertiveness in relationships. Since withdrawal ruptures are harder to detect, we will give you the opportunity to work with a list of them in the following exercise.

Learning objectives: Be capable of detecting and handling withdrawal ruptures.

Level of difficulty:

How to make it easier: Choose to work with stimuli that feel a little easier. You can also focus on one

skill criteria to start with, and then add another when it feels easier.

How to make it harder: you can always use a personal example: something a patient said, where you

had a feeling of some unspoken critique, and use the same skill criteria, to that stimulus.

Instructions for Roleplay of Withdrawal Ruptures (2 participants):

1. STIMULUS (the person playing the client): Read the client statement (see below for different examples)

2. RESPONSE (the person playing the therapist): Improvise an answer based on the skill criteria:

a) Reflect what you notice (rupture marker)

b) Validate the client´s withdrawal

c) Invite the client to further explore the rupture

3. MONITOR: Therapist: How hard was this? Do we have to adjust (make it harder or easier)?

Client: Did the therapist fulfill the skill criteria a), b), and c)?

4. FEEDBACK & ADJUSTMENTS: Give each other feedback, adjust if needed, and give it another try!

NOTE! ONLY when the client statement feels easy to respond to, you may proceed to the next client

statement and keep following these same four steps.

SKILL CRITERIA - Withdrawal Ruptures

a) Say what you notice (rupture marker)

b) Validate the client´s withdrawal

c) Invite the client to further exploration of the rupture

Example 1:

Client statement: It has to feel pretty hopeless to have a patient like me. I can´t even answer your questions!

Therapist response 1: It seems to me that these thoughts are devaluing and handicapping you, omitting other aspects of you and your experiences that you might have. (Say what you notice – rupture marker)

Therapist response 2: You seem to feel inept, and if I were in your shoes, that would give me an impulse to withdraw. (validation)

Therapist response 3: Would it make sense to you if we together approach you instead, to see if there can be something more of interest here? (invite to exploration)

Example 2:

Client statement: “When my son decided he wanted to learn to become a carpenter, my husband was thrilled! He started play-fighting him and was super encouraging. You could really tell that he was very happy”.

Therapist response 1: I notice that you´re telling me about your husbands’ reactions to your sons’ choice of education.

Therapist response 2: I do understand it can feel odd to speak up about your own reactions in different situations, since that has been forbidden in your history.

Therapist response 3: Since we are here you and me, I wonder if you are willing to take a look at your own feelings in this moment?

Got questions? ask us on the societies Facebook group! Just click the button above :-)

an example client to respond to - good luck!

Stimuli:

Previous
Previous

Neuroplasticity, Deliberate Practice and our willingness to grow

Next
Next

Goal-setting in Psychotherapy